Teaching Paper: Accountability Frameworks for Non-Profits: Strengthening Governance, Donor, and Beneficiary Relationships
Author: Dr. Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Affiliation: NEYA Global | NEYA Global Publishing
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5669-1676
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-acbldtrthrtrns-tp-01
This material forms part of the NEYA Global knowledge architecture. Institutional, organizational, professional, training, consulting, curriculum, program design, or implementation use requires an active license from NEYA Global
Explore Architecture →
Module Overview →
Request Institutional Access →
About the Teaching Paper
Accountability remains a cornerstone of legitimacy and sustainability in the non-profit sector. This Teaching Paper presents three interrelated accountability frameworks—governance and board accountability, donor accountability, and beneficiary accountability—that enable organisations to balance transparency, ethics, and mission alignment. The frameworks integrate theory and practice, showing how clear roles, participatory mechanisms, transparent reporting, and evaluation processes can strengthen trust among boards, donors, and communities. A case study from an East African NGO illustrates how implementing these frameworks increased both donor retention and community confidence. Reflection questions and practical tools support application in diverse organisational contexts, making this paper a bridge between scholarly analysis and applied management.
Key Topics
- Governance and board accountability
- Donor transparency and impact reporting
- Beneficiary participation and feedback mechanisms
- Balancing upward and downward accountability
- Ethical and cultural dimensions of accountability
- Strategic integration of evaluation and learning
Suggested Citation
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Teaching Paper: Accountability Frameworks for Non-Profits: Strengthening Governance, Donor, and Beneficiary Relationships. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-acbldtrthrtrns-tp-01
References
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations (5th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking “Participation”: Models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283.
https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsn010
Drucker, P. F. (1990). Managing the non-profit organization: Principles and practices. HarperCollins.
Ebrahim, A. (2003). Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813–829.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00014-7
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Theoretical foundations of accountability in non-profit organisations. Neya Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies.
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-ntallstrscimp-02
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Dimensions of accountability in non-profit organisations. Neya Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies.
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-acbldtrthrtrns-03
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Accountability in non-profit organisations: A multidimensional balancing act. Neya Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies.
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-acbldtrthrtrns-09
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Accountability: Building Trust through Transparency. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/accountability-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Ethical Decision-Making. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/ethical-decision-making-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). CSR: Legal and Ethical Issues. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/csr-legal-ethical-issues-2025
O'Dwyer, B., & Unerman, J. (2008). The paradox of greater NGO accountability: A case study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(7–8), 801–824.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.02.002
Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Sage.
Taylor, B. E., Chait, R. P., & Holland, T. P. (1996). The new work of the nonprofit board. Harvard Business Review, 74(5), 36–46.
