Structures and Governance of Non-Profit Networks: Balancing Autonomy, Coordination, and Accountability
Author: Dr. Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Publisher: NEYA Global Publishing
Article | NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies
Year: 2025
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5669-1676
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-ntallstrscimp-05
Usage Terms: Institutional, organizational, or professional use requires an active license from NEYA Global
About the Article
The sustainability of NGO collaboration depends on governance structures that balance autonomy with coordination and legitimacy with efficiency. This article analyzes the architecture of non-profit networks through three primary lenses—structure, accountability, and leadership. It contrasts centralized, decentralized, and polycentric governance models, exploring how each configuration affects decision-making, participation, and resilience. Centralized forms offer efficiency and coherence but risk exclusion and overconcentration of power; decentralized and polycentric models enhance inclusivity and legitimacy but may slow responses. Leadership emerges as both enabling and constraining, as brokers facilitate coordination but can create dependency. The analysis highlights that effective governance requires institutionalized mechanisms for decision-making, accountability, and conflict resolution. By integrating theoretical frameworks with real-world practices, the article positions governance not as a static design but as an adaptive process fundamental to network legitimacy, functionality, and sustainability.
Key Topics
- NGO network governance models
- Centralization vs. decentralization
- Polycentric and hybrid structures
- Accountability and conflict resolution
- Leadership and brokerage
- Legitimacy and sustainability
Suggested Citation
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Structures and Governance of Non-Profit Networks: Balancing Autonomy, Coordination, and Accountability. NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-ntallstrscimp-05
References
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199249145.001.0001
Ebrahim, A. (2003). Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813–829.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00014-7
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Networks & Alliances: Strategies for Social Impact. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/collaboration-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Forms of non-profit collaboration: Typologies, structures, and strategic trade-offs. Neya Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies.
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-ntallstrscimp-03
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Measuring the effectiveness of NGO networks: Outcomes, processes, and methodological challenges. Neya Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies.
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-ntallstrscimp-08
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Governance frameworks for NGO networks – Balancing autonomy, accountability, and efficiency (Teaching Paper). Neya Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies.
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-ntallstrscimp-tp-02
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Network maps and alliance models for non-profit collaboration (Teaching Paper). Neya Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies.
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-ntallstrscimp-tp-01
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Crisis Communication: Engaging Communities. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/crisis-communication-2025
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763
Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015
