Strategies of Survival and Adaptation in Restrictive Civic Environments
Author: Dr. Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Publisher: NEYA Global Publishing
Article | NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies
Year: 2025
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5669-1676
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-cvscunprrsenv-03
This material forms part of the NEYA Global knowledge architecture. Institutional, organizational, professional, training, consulting, curriculum, program design, or implementation use requires an active license from NEYA Global
Explore Architecture →
Module Overview →
Request Institutional Access →
About the Article
Civil society organizations operating under restrictive conditions demonstrate remarkable capacity for adaptation. This article explores how non-profits and civic actors sustain their missions within legal, political, and cultural constraints. It identifies a repertoire of survival strategies—legal compliance and mimicry, gendered adaptations, informal networks, and transnational advocacy—that enable continued operation even amid repression. Drawing on comparative politics, development studies, and global governance theory, the analysis conceptualizes adaptation as a multidimensional process grounded in negotiation, trust, and creativity. Through case examples from authoritarian and hybrid regimes, the article shows how NGOs balance visibility with safety and legitimacy with resilience. It contributes to academic discourse by reframing civil society as a dynamic rather than fragile actor and provides practical insight for donors and policymakers seeking to strengthen local agency without heightening vulnerability.
Key Topics
- Civil society adaptation
- Restrictive civic environments
- Legal compliance and mimicry
- Informal resistance networks
- Gendered advocacy strategies
- Transnational NGO collaboration
Suggested Citation
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Strategies of Survival and Adaptation in Restrictive Civic Environments. NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-cvscunprrsenv-03
References
Carothers, T. (2016). Closing space for international democracy and human rights support. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 8(3), 358-377.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huw012
Carothers, T., & Brechenmacher, S. (2014). Closing space: Democracy and human rights support under fire. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Dupuy, K., Ron, J., & Prakash, A. (2016). Hands off my regime! Governments' restrictions on foreign aid to non-governmental organizations. World Development, 84, 299-311.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.02.001
Glasius, M. (2017). Extraterritorial authoritarian practices: A framework. Globalizations, 15(2), 179-197.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2017.1403781
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Civil Society Under Pressure: Restrictive Environments. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/civil-society-under-pressure-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Public Policy: Power and Influence in Decision-Making. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/public-policy-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Board-Executive Relation. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/board-executive-relations-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). CSR: Legal and Ethical Issues. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/csr-legal-ethical-issues-2025
Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. Yale University Press.
Tripp, A. M. (2015). Women and power in post-conflict Africa. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316336014
Wedeen, L. (1999). Ambiguities of domination: Politics, rhetoric, and symbols in contemporary Syria. University of Chicago Press.
