Reporting Qualitative Findings: Strategies for Clarity, Accessibility, and Impact
Author: Dr. Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Publisher: NEYA Global Publishing
Article | NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies
Year: 2025
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5669-1676
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-ql-rchfr-mth-09
This material forms part of the NEYA Global knowledge architecture. Institutional, organizational, professional, training, consulting, curriculum, program design, or implementation use requires an active license from NEYA Global
Explore Architecture →
Module Overview →
Request Institutional Access →
About the Article
This article examines best practices for reporting qualitative research in non-profit contexts, emphasizing clarity, accessibility, and impact. It outlines structured approaches to report writing, including thematic organization, narrative integration, and the use of participant quotations and case studies. Visual tools such as charts, diagrams, and word clouds are highlighted for enhancing comprehension. The article addresses strategies for tailoring reports to diverse stakeholders, ensuring both methodological rigor and practical relevance. Techniques such as triangulation, member checking, peer debriefing, and reflexivity are discussed to enhance transparency and credibility. By applying these strategies, non-profits can transform research findings into actionable insights that inform program design, advocacy, and decision-making.
Key Topics
- Qualitative research
- Reporting findings
- Transparency
- Stakeholder engagement
- Visual communication
- Non-profit research
Suggested Citation
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Reporting Qualitative Findings: Strategies for Clarity, Accessibility, and Impact. NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-ql-rchfr-mth-09
References
| Chambers, R. (2014). Rural development: Putting the last first. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835815 | ||||
| Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE. | ||||
| Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Qualitative Research Methods. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/qualitative-research-methods-2025 | ||||
| Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Quantitative Research Methods. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/quantitative-research-methods-2025 | ||||
| Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Program Evaluation: Frameworks and Best Practices. NEYA Global Publishing. | ||||
| Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Visualizing Impact: Data Communication Strategies. NEYA Global Publishing. | ||||
| Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). The Role of Qualitative Research in Non-Profit Contexts. NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies. https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-ql-rchfr-mth-01 | ||||
| Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Applications of Qualitative Research in Non-Profit Organizations. NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies. https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-ql-rchfr-mth-10 | ||||
| Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 | ||||
| Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE. | ||||
| Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. SAGE. | ||||
| Chambers, R. (2017). Participatory workshops: A sourcebook of 21 sets of ideas and activities. Routledge. | ||||
