Outcome Measurement in Non-Profit Program Evaluation
Author: Dr. Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Publisher: NEYA Global Publishing
Article | NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies
Year: 2025
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5669-1676
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-pr-evl-fr-bst-pr-05
This material forms part of the NEYA Global knowledge architecture. Institutional, organizational, professional, training, consulting, curriculum, program design, or implementation use requires an active license from NEYA Global
Explore Architecture →
Module Overview →
Request Institutional Access →
About the Article
Outcome measurement is central to non-profit program evaluation, enabling organizations to demonstrate impact, improve program design, and strengthen accountability. This article explores the theoretical foundations, practical strategies, and tools for measuring outcomes, distinguishing outputs from outcomes, and categorizing short-term, intermediate, and long-term changes. It emphasizes mixed-methods approaches, integrating both technological tools—such as mobile data collection, GIS mapping, and visualization software—and low-tech alternatives suitable for resource-limited contexts. Case studies from literacy, health, and water sanitation programs illustrate practical application and adaptation. Engaging stakeholders in indicator selection and data collection ensures relevance, credibility, and utilization of findings. The article positions outcome measurement as a technical and participatory practice that supports organizational learning, evidence-based decision-making, and sustainable community impact.
Key Topics
- Outcome Measurement
- Outputs and Outcomes
- Non-Profit Evaluation
- Indicators
- Mixed-Methods
- Resource-Limited Contexts
Suggested Citation
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Outcome Measurement in Non-Profit Program Evaluation. NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies. Neya Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-pr-evl-fr-bst-pr-tp-04
References
| Bamberger, M., Rugh, J., & Mabry, L. (2012). RealWorld evaluation: Working under budget, time, data, and political constraints (2nd ed.). Sage. | ||||
| Chambers, R. (1994). Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Challenges, potentials and paradigm. World Development, 22(10), 1437-1454. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90030-2 | ||||
| Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. Jossey-Bass. | ||||
| Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Program Evaluation: Frameworks and Best Practices. NEYA Global Publishing. | ||||
| Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Monitoring & Evaluation in International Development. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/monitoring-evaluation-international-development-2025 | ||||
| Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Tools for Strategic Evaluation. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/tools-evaluation-2025 | ||||
| Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Data Analysis: Turning Information into Insight. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/data-analysis-insight-2025 | ||||
| Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Measuring Program Outcomes: Indicators, Methods, and Applications in Non-Profit Evaluation. NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies. https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-pr-ev-bt-pr-05 | ||||
| Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Using Evaluation Results for Program Improvement in Non-Profits. NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies. https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-pr-ev-bt-pr-09 | ||||
| Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Sage. | ||||
| Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Sage. | ||||
| Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation: Methods for studying programs and policies. Prentice Hall. | ||||
