Measuring Impact under Restriction: Rethinking Evaluation for Civil Society
Author: Dr. Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Publisher: NEYA Global Publishing
Article | NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies
Year: 2025
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5669-1676
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-cvscunprrsenv-06
This material forms part of the NEYA Global knowledge architecture. Institutional, organizational, professional, training, consulting, curriculum, program design, or implementation use requires an active license from NEYA Global
Explore Architecture →
Module Overview →
Request Institutional Access →
About the Article
Monitoring and evaluating civil society organizations in restrictive environments demands a redefinition of what constitutes “impact.” Conventional evaluation systems—built on transparency, data accessibility, and visible outputs—are often unworkable or dangerous under authoritarian or hybrid regimes. This article argues that impact must instead be measured in terms of survival, continuity, and the preservation of civic space. Drawing on theories of social capital and symbolic politics, it introduces proxy indicators such as trust, solidarity, and symbolic action to capture the invisible resilience of NGOs. Patton’s framework of developmental evaluation is proposed as a flexible, adaptive alternative to donor-driven metrics. By situating evaluation within local contexts and ethical constraints, the article contributes to scholarly debates on complexity and resilience while providing practical guidance for practitioners seeking to assess impact safely and meaningfully in high-risk environments.
Key Topics
- Impact measurement in restrictive contexts
- Proxy indicators of resilience
- Developmental evaluation
- Social capital and trust
- Donor accountability and ethics
- Civil society innovation under repression
Suggested Citation
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Measuring Impact under Restriction: Rethinking Evaluation for Civil Society. NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-cvscunprrsenv-06
References
Eben, R. (2013). Aid and accountability: Evaluating donor frameworks in fragile contexts. Zed Books.
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Civil Society Under Pressure: Restrictive Environments. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/civil-society-under-pressure-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Impact Assessment: Measuring & Communicating. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/impact-assessment-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Accountability: Building Trust through Transparency. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/accountability-2025
Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. Guilford Press.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990
Smirl, L. (2015). Spaces of aid: How cars, compounds and hotels shape humanitarianism. International Political Sociology, 9(1), 27-43.
https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350222748
Tilly, C. (2005). Contentious politics. Paradigm Publishers.
