Gathering and Using Participant Feedback for Continuous Workshop Improvement
Author: Dr. Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Publisher: NEYA Global Publishing
Article | NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies
Year: 2025
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5669-1676
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-ds-eng-wsh-08
This material forms part of the NEYA Global knowledge architecture. Institutional, organizational, professional, training, consulting, curriculum, program design, or implementation use requires an active license from NEYA Global
Explore Architecture →
Module Overview →
Request Institutional Access →
About the Article
Feedback from participants is a cornerstone of workshop effectiveness, ensuring that sessions remain relevant, responsive, and continuously improving. This article examines the central role of participant feedback in shaping workshops that are both practical and impactful, particularly in resource-constrained environments where the optimal use of time and resources is essential. It outlines methods for collecting feedback, including real-time polls, surveys, informal conversations, and anonymous tools, and highlights the importance of cultural sensitivity in selecting feedback mechanisms. The analysis emphasizes the need to evaluate both quantitative indicators (e.g., ratings and scales) and qualitative responses (e.g., comments and narratives) to capture participant perspectives fully. Case studies demonstrate how pre- and post-workshop surveys, informal exchanges, and culturally adapted methods enhance the quality of insights. By translating feedback into adjustments in content, facilitation, and logistics, facilitators create a continuous learning loop that improves engagement and outcomes. The article concludes that feedback is not simply evaluative but transformative, enabling workshops to evolve in alignment with participants’ needs, preferences, and cultural contexts.
Key Topics
- Participant feedback
- Workshop evaluation
- Continuous improvement
- Qualitative and quantitative analysis
- Cultural sensitivity
- Resource-constrained settings
Suggested Citation
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Gathering and Using Participant Feedback for Continuous Workshop Improvement. NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies. Neya Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-ds-eng-wsh-08
References
| Brookfield, S. D., & Preskill, S. (2005). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for democratic classrooms (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass. | ||||
| Chambers, R. (2014). Rural development: Putting the last first. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835815 | ||||
| Ebrahim, A. (2003). Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00014-7 | ||||
| Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Designing and Delivering Engaging Workshops. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/designing-and-delivering-engaging-workshops-2025 | ||||
| Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Program Development and Evaluation: Maximizing Impact. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/program-development-evaluation-2025 | ||||
| Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Training: Evaluation and Impact Assessment. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/training-evaluation-impact-2025 | ||||
| Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Building Learning Organization. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/building-learning-organization-2025 | ||||
| Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Collecting and Using Workshop Feedback - Practical Templates for Evaluation. NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies (Teaching Paper). | ||||
| Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Evaluating Workshop Effectiveness: Methods for Continuous Improvement and Stakeholder Engagement. NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies. https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-ds-eng-wsh-09 | ||||
| Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education. | ||||
| Patton, M. Q. (2015). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. Guilford Press. | ||||
