Future Trends in Strategic Evaluation for Non-Profits
Author: Dr. Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Publisher: NEYA Global | NEYA Global Publishing
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5669-1676
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps.tse-11
Open Publication PDF →
This material forms part of the NEYA Global knowledge architecture. Institutional, organizational, professional, training, consulting, curriculum, program design, or implementation use requires an active license from NEYA Global
Explore Architecture →
Module Overview →
Request Institutional Access →
About the Article
This article explores future directions in non-profit strategic evaluation, focusing on the transformative impact of artificial intelligence, machine learning, real-time monitoring via the Internet of Things (IoT), and integrated evaluation platforms. It highlights participatory approaches as essential for ensuring stakeholder ownership and legitimacy, while advances in tools such as Tableau, Power BI, R, Python, and Qualtrics expand analytical and visualization capacity. Beyond technology, the article stresses the importance of building organizational capacity, continuous learning, and adaptability to ensure that evaluation remains relevant, responsible, and sustainable in dynamic environments.
Key Topics
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in evaluation
- Real-time monitoring and IoT applications
- Integrated platforms for data collection and reporting
- Participatory evaluation approaches
- Advanced tools for data analysis and visualization
- Building staff and organizational capacity for future evaluation
Academic Value
The article contributes to the growing discourse on the future of evaluation by integrating perspectives on technological innovation, participatory practices, and organizational learning. It offers both theoretical insights and practical guidance, demonstrating how non-profits can transform evaluation into a driver of resilience, adaptability, and long-term mission success.
Suggested Citation
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Future Trends in Strategic Evaluation for Non-Profits. NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps.tse-11
References
Bamberger, M., Vaessen, J., & Raimondo, E. (2016). Dealing with complexity in development evaluation: A practical approach. Sage Publications.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483399935
Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Ebrahim, A., & Rangan, V. K. (2014). What impact? A framework for measuring the scale and scope of social performance. California Management Review, 56(3), 118-141.
https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2014.56.3.118
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Future trends in strategic evaluation for non-profits. Neya Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies.
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps.tse-11
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Reporting and communicating results in non-profit strategic evaluation. Neya Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies.
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps.tse-08
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Strategic evaluation in non-profit organizations: Frameworks, practices, and emerging trends. Neya Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies.
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps.tse-01
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Technology Tools for Efficiency & Impact. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/technology-tools-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Technology for Global Impact. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/technology-global-impact-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Tools for Strategic Evaluation. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/tools-evaluation-2025
McLaughlin, J. A., & Jordan, G. B. (1999). Logic models: A tool for telling your program's performance story. Evaluation and Program Planning, 22(1), 65-72.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(98)00042-1
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Salamon, L. M. (2012). The resilient sector revisited: The new challenge to nonprofit America. Brookings Institution Press.
