Developing Effective Evaluation Frameworks for Nonprofit Programs
Author: Dr. Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Publisher: NEYA Global Publishing
Article | NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies
Year: 2025
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5669-1676
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-tr-ev-imp-as-03
This material forms part of the NEYA Global knowledge architecture. Institutional, organizational, professional, training, consulting, curriculum, program design, or implementation use requires an active license from NEYA Global
Explore Architecture →
Module Overview →
Request Institutional Access →
About the Article
Evaluation frameworks are essential tools for nonprofits to systematically measure program effectiveness, ensure accountability, and strengthen decision-making. This article examines three core models—the Kirkpatrick Model, the Logic Model, and the Theory of Change—highlighting their distinctive strengths, limitations, and practical applications across contexts such as literacy, vocational training, health, agriculture, and microfinance. It outlines the building blocks of effective frameworks, including inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes, and impacts, and offers guidance for developing customized systems that balance rigor with feasibility. By integrating stakeholder engagement, cost-effective data collection, and adaptive design, nonprofits can create evaluation frameworks that improve performance, demonstrate accountability, and contribute to sustainable development outcomes.
Key Topics
- Evaluation frameworks in nonprofit programs
- Kirkpatrick Model for training outcomes
- Logic Model for structured program planning
- Theory of Change for systemic transformation
- Inputs, outputs, outcomes, and impact analysis
- Balancing rigor, feasibility, and adaptability
Suggested Citation
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Developing effective evaluation frameworks for nonprofit programs. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-tr-ev-imp-as-03
References
| Chambers, R. (2014). Rural development: Putting the last first. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835815 | ||||
| Ebrahim, A. (2003). Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00014-7 | ||||
| Funnell, S. C., & Rogers, P. J. (2011). Purposeful program theory: Effective use of theories of change and logic models. Jossey-Bass. | ||||
| Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Training: Evaluation and Impact Assessment. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/training-evaluation-impact-2025 | ||||
| Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Foundations of Training and Capacity Building. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/foundations-training-capacity-2025 | ||||
| Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Developing Training Programs: From Concept to Delivery. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/developing-training-programs-2025 | ||||
| Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Program Development and Evaluation: Maximizing Impact. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/program-development-evaluation-2025 | ||||
| Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Setting Evaluation Goals and Objectives in Nonprofit Programs. NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies. https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-tr-ev-imp-as-04 | ||||
| Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Ethical Considerations in Evaluation and Impact Assessment. NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies. https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-tr-ev-imp-as-10 | ||||
| Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler. | ||||
| Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2019). Evaluation: A systematic approach (8th ed.). SAGE. | ||||
