Community-Driven Apps and Platforms: Designing, Deploying, and Sustaining Digital Participation
Author: Dr. Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Publisher: NEYA Global Publishing
Article | NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies
Year: 2025
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5669-1676
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-tchdrcmeng-05
This material forms part of the NEYA Global knowledge architecture. Institutional, organizational, professional, training, consulting, curriculum, program design, or implementation use requires an active license from NEYA Global
Explore Architecture →
Module Overview →
Request Institutional Access →
About the Article
The rise of mobile connectivity and low-cost technologies has enabled communities to design and manage digital platforms that address local challenges. This article synthesizes human-centred design and ICT4D principles into a lifecycle framework for building and sustaining community-driven apps and civic technologies. It outlines practical steps—needs assessment, goal setting, inclusive UX for low-literacy and low-bandwidth environments, iterative testing, capacity-building, and ethical data practices—grounded in global case studies such as Nextdoor, SeeClickFix, Ushahidi, CommCare, and community-built crisis portals. The discussion links design choices to long-term inclusion, accountability, and sustainability, emphasizing that effective community platforms require not only technical innovation but also participatory governance and institutional integration. The resulting framework supports practitioners and scholars in developing equitable, durable, and context-appropriate digital participation systems.
Key Topics
- Civic technology and ICT4D
- Human-centred and participatory design
- Inclusive UX and accessibility
- Data ethics and privacy governance
- Community-led platform sustainability
- Co-design and institutional integration
Suggested Citation
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Community-Driven Apps and Platforms: Designing, Deploying, and Sustaining Digital Participation. NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-tchdrcmeng-05
References
Abras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D., & Preece, J. (2004). User-centered design. In W. Bainbridge (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. Sage.
Heeks, R. (2017). Information and Communication Technology for Development (ICT4D). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315652603
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Tech-Driven Community Engagement. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/tech-driven-community-engagement-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Participatory Development for Change. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/participatory-development-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Resilience: Psychological Strength for Leaders & Teams. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/resilience-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Affordable and accessible technology solutions for community engagement. Neya Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies.
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-tchdrcmeng-11
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Building digital literacy and capacity for inclusive community engagement. Neya Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies.
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-tchdrcmeng-07
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Overcoming challenges in digital community engagement: Connectivity, inclusion, affordability, and trust. Neya Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies.
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-tchdrcmeng-09
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Sustaining community engagement: Strategies for long-term participation and ownership. Neya Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies.
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-tchdrcmeng-10
Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-052029-2.50009-7
Okolloh, O. (2009). Ushahidi, or "testimony": Web 2.0 tools for crowdsourcing crisis information. Participatory Learning and Action, 59, 65-70.
van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2015). Toward a multifaceted model of Internet access for understanding digital divides: An empirical investigation. Information Society, 31(5), 379-391.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2015.1069770
