Civil Society under Pressure: Adaptive Strategies of Non-Profits in Restrictive Environments
Author: Dr. Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Publisher: NEYA Global Publishing
Article | NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies
Year: 2025
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5669-1676
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-cvscunprrsenv-01
This material forms part of the NEYA Global knowledge architecture. Institutional, organizational, professional, training, consulting, curriculum, program design, or implementation use requires an active license from NEYA Global
Explore Architecture →
Module Overview →
Request Institutional Access →
About the Article
Over the past decade, civic space has contracted worldwide, constraining the capacity of civil society organizations (CSOs) and non-profits to operate freely. This article examines how these actors adapt to restrictive legal, political, cultural, and digital contexts. Drawing on comparative politics and civil society studies, it situates shrinking civic space within the frameworks of authoritarian resilience and democratic backsliding. Through analysis of Russia’s “foreign agents” law, China’s Overseas NGO Law, and cases from Africa and Asia, the article identifies adaptive strategies such as legal restructuring, digital security innovation, and transnational collaboration. It argues that while restrictive regimes suppress formal activism, they also drive organizational creativity and informal resilience. The findings provide critical insights for scholars, donors, and practitioners seeking to support civil society without exacerbating risk, emphasizing that repressive environments can simultaneously serve as sites of repression and of social innovation.
Key Topics
- Shrinking civic space
- Non-profit adaptation
- Authoritarian resilience
- Democratic backsliding
- Digital security and activism
- Transnational partnerships
Suggested Citation
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Civil Society under Pressure: Adaptive Strategies of Non-Profits in Restrictive Environments. NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-cvscunprrsenv-01
References
Bermeo, N. (2016). On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 5-19.
https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0012
Carothers, T., & Brechenmacher, S. (2014). Closing space: Democracy and human rights support under fire. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Clark-Kazak, C. (2017). Ethical considerations: Research with people in situations of forced migration. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 36(3), 1-23.
Diamond, L. (1999). Developing democracy: Toward consolidation. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dupuy, K., Ron, J., & Prakash, A. (2015). Who survived? Ethiopia's regulatory crackdown on foreign-funded NGOs. Review of International Political Economy, 22(2), 419-456.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2014.903854
Glasius, M. (2017). Extraterritorial authoritarian practices: A framework. Globalizations, 15(2), 179-197.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2017.1403781
Haynes, D. F. (2019). The limits of donor-driven accountability in NGO work. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 26(1), 143-172.
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Civil Society Under Pressure: Restrictive Environments. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/civil-society-under-pressure-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Functions, Impact, and Identity of Civil Society. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/functions-impact-civil-society-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Organizational Legitimacy: Earning & Sustaining Public Trust. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/legitimacy-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Ethical Decision-Making. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/ethical-decision-making-2025
