Challenges in Bringing Change: Structural, Legitimacy, and Accountability Constraints for NGOs
Author: Dr. Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Publisher: NEYA Global Publishing
Article | NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies
Year: 2025
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5669-1676
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-hworgbrchmchscimp-08
This material forms part of the NEYA Global knowledge architecture. Institutional, organizational, professional, training, consulting, curriculum, program design, or implementation use requires an active license from NEYA Global
Explore Architecture →
Module Overview →
Request Institutional Access →
About the Article
This article examines the structural, political, and ethical challenges that limit the capacity of non-profit organisations to achieve systemic social change. It identifies five interrelated constraints: donor dependency, methodological dilemmas in measuring impact, legitimacy crises, accountability conflicts, and external political and cultural resistance. Donor-driven funding structures and short project cycles encourage mission drift and reinforce upward accountability, while impact frameworks based on attribution overlook the collective and contextual nature of change. NGOs also face recurring legitimacy tensions—both from governments that portray them as foreign agents and from communities that question their representativeness. Acting as intermediaries between donors and beneficiaries, NGOs struggle to reconcile competing accountabilities and navigate ethical dilemmas of representation. These internal challenges are compounded by shrinking civic spaces and neoliberal market pressures. Framing these constraints as structural rather than incidental, the article underscores that NGO influence is shaped by the same power systems it seeks to transform, requiring continuous reflection, adaptability, and ethical resilience.
Key Topics
- Structural and political constraints on NGOs
- Resource dependency and mission drift
- Legitimacy and accountability dilemmas
- Ethical representation and participation
- Political and cultural resistance
- Resilience and adaptive legitimacy strategies
Suggested Citation
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Challenges in Bringing Change: Structural, Legitimacy, and Accountability Constraints for NGOs. NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-hworgbrchmchscimp-08
References
Banks, N., Hulme, D., & Edwards, M. (2015). NGOs, states, and donors revisited: Still too close for comfort? World Development, 66, 707–718.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.028
Choudry, A., & Kapoor, D. (Eds.). (2013). NGOization: Complicity, Contradictions and Prospects. Zed Books.
https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350221512.0005
Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355.x
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). How Organizations Bring Change: Mechanisms of Social Impact. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/change-mechanisms-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Organisational structures and mechanisms of change in non-profit organisations. Neya Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies.
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-hworgbrchmchscimp-05
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Mechanisms of NGO social change: An integrated framework of inputs, processes, structures, and outcomes. Neya Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies.
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-hworgbrchmchscimp-10
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Accountability: Building Trust through Transparency. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/accountability-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Organizational Legitimacy: Earning & Sustaining Public Trust. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/legitimacy-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Civil Society Under Pressure: Restrictive Environments. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/civil-society-under-pressure-2025
Najam, A. (1996). NGO accountability: A conceptual framework. Development Policy Review, 14(4), 339–353.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.1996.tb00112.x
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row.
Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973529
