Challenges and Solutions in Monitoring and Evaluation: Strengthening Practice in Diverse Contexts
Author: Dr. Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Publisher: NEYA Global Publishing
Journal: NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies (ERDO)
Year: 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-me-challenges-2025
Open Publication PDF →
This material forms part of the NEYA Global knowledge architecture. Institutional, organizational, professional, training, consulting, curriculum, program design, or implementation use requires an active license from NEYA Global
Explore Architecture →
Module Overview →
Request Institutional Access →
About the Article
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) systems are essential for accountability, learning, and evidence-based decision-making in development, yet they often face systemic and contextual challenges. This article examines key obstacles, including resource constraints, data quality concerns, stakeholder resistance, program complexity, and cultural variability. It also highlights ethical issues such as informed consent, confidentiality, and respect for local norms.
Practical solutions discussed include resource mobilization, capacity building, process simplification, and culturally responsive approaches. Digital tools such as mobile platforms and remote data collection are emphasized as valuable innovations for overcoming barriers in low-resource or hard-to-reach contexts. By combining methodological rigor, ethical integrity, and contextual adaptability, the article argues that challenges in M&E can be effectively managed. Addressing these barriers strengthens both the credibility and the usability of findings, ensuring that development programs remain accountable, relevant, and sustainable.
Key Topics
- Common systemic and contextual challenges in M&E
- Resource limitations and capacity gaps
- Data quality issues and strategies for improvement
- Stakeholder resistance and engagement methods
- Complexity in multi-sectoral programs
- Cultural and contextual adaptation in evaluation
- Ethical principles in M&E practice
- Digital innovations for low-resource and remote settings
Academic Value
This article contributes to the study of M&E by systematically linking challenges with practical, ethical, and technological solutions. For scholars, it advances understanding of how methodological and contextual factors interact to shape evaluation practice. For practitioners, it provides actionable strategies to strengthen M&E systems under diverse conditions, including resource-poor environments. By emphasizing adaptability, participation, and innovation, the article reinforces the role of M&E as both a technical and transformative process in international development.
References
Bamberger, M., Rugh, J., & Mabry, L. (2012). RealWorld evaluation: Working under budget, time, data, and political constraints (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Challenges and solutions in monitoring and evaluation: Strengthening practice in diverse contexts. Neya Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies.
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-me-challenges-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Case studies of effective monitoring and evaluation practices in international development. Neya Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies.
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-me-casestudies-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Monitoring and evaluation frameworks and approaches: RBM, LogFrame, and Theory of Change. Neya Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies.
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-me-frameworks-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Qualitative research methods. Neya Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/qualitative-research-methods-2025
Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. C. (2004). Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system. World Bank.
https://doi.org/10.1596/11269
OECD DAC. (2019). Better criteria for better evaluation: Revised evaluation criteria definitions and principles for use. OECD Publishing.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE.
Simons, H. (2009). Case study research in practice. SAGE.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268322
World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). Monitoring and evaluation for health programs: Strengthening systems in low-resource settings. WHO.
World Bank. (2021). Using technology to improve monitoring and evaluation in development programs. World Bank Group.
