Case Studies in Accountability Practices: Comparative Insights from Non-Profit Organisations
Author: Dr. Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Publisher: NEYA Global Publishing
Article | NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies
Year: 2025
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5669-1676
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-acbldtrthrtrns-07
This material forms part of the NEYA Global knowledge architecture. Institutional, organizational, professional, training, consulting, curriculum, program design, or implementation use requires an active license from NEYA Global
Explore Architecture →
Module Overview →
Request Institutional Access →
About the Article
Accountability manifests differently across non-profit organisational forms, shaped by scale, structure, and mission. This article uses a comparative case study approach to examine how accountability operates in three organisational types: large international NGOs (INGOs), small grassroots NGOs, and networked coalitions. It integrates principal–agent, stakeholder, and legitimacy theories to analyse both structural mechanisms and relational practices. Large INGOs demonstrate strong compliance and oversight but limited community engagement; grassroots NGOs embody trust-based accountability constrained by donor reporting demands; and coalitions reveal hybrid, peer-based models that prioritise collective norms and shared legitimacy. Comparative insights highlight that scale and context matter, hybrid mechanisms enhance adaptability, and accountability remains a dynamic negotiation between donor expectations and mission ethics. The study underscores that sustainable accountability arises from integrating formal structures with participatory and relational approaches.
Key Topics
- Comparative accountability across organisational types
- INGOs, grassroots NGOs, and networked coalitions
- Structural and relational accountability mechanisms
- Hybrid governance and legitimacy
- Context sensitivity and scale in accountability design
- Balancing donor-driven and mission-driven ethics
Suggested Citation
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Case Studies in Accountability Practices: Comparative Insights from Non-Profit Organisations. NEYA Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-acbldtrthrtrns-07
References
Banks, N., Hulme, D., & Edwards, M. (2015). NGOs, states, and donors revisited: Still too close for comfort? World Development, 66, 707–718.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.028
Bies, A., Brown, W. A., & Madden, D. (2019). Examining the relationship between accountability and mission achievement in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 30(2), 199–217.
Ebrahim, A. (2003). Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813–829.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00014-7
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Accountability: Building Trust through Transparency. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/accountability-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Mechanisms of accountability in non-profit organisations. Neya Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies.
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-acbldtrthrtrns-04
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Challenges in accountability for non-profit organisations. Neya Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies.
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-acbldtrthrtrns-06
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Accountability in non-profit organisations: A multidimensional balancing act. Neya Global Journal of Non-Profit Studies.
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-acbldtrthrtrns-09
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Organizational Legitimacy: Earning & Sustaining Public Trust. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/legitimacy-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). Public Policy: Power and Influence in Decision-Making. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/public-policy-2025
Kazanskaia, A. N. (2025). How Organizations Bring Change: Mechanisms of Social Impact. NEYA Global Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.64357/change-mechanisms-2025
Fowler, A. (2000). Beyond partnership: Getting real about NGO relationships in the aid system. IDS Bulletin, 31(3), 1–13.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2000.mp31003001.x
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Cornell University Press.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
